<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Drayage: An Inside Look at How It Works and How You Can Save (Part I)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tradeshowfeed.com/2009/08/behind-the-scenes-on-budget-a-dialog-on-tradeshow-expenses-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tradeshowfeed.com/2009/08/behind-the-scenes-on-budget-a-dialog-on-tradeshow-expenses-part-i/</link>
	<description>Thought Leadership for Trade Show Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 12:36:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drayage Counterpoint: It's the Labor Costs! &#124; Trade show Feed</title>
		<link>http://tradeshowfeed.com/2009/08/behind-the-scenes-on-budget-a-dialog-on-tradeshow-expenses-part-i/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Drayage Counterpoint: It's the Labor Costs! &#124; Trade show Feed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 15:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradeshowfeed.com/?p=252#comment-50</guid>
		<description>[...] more perspective, we recommend our own look at the topic in Drayage Debate, Part I and Part [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more perspective, we recommend our own look at the topic in Drayage Debate, Part I and Part [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wells</title>
		<link>http://tradeshowfeed.com/2009/08/behind-the-scenes-on-budget-a-dialog-on-tradeshow-expenses-part-i/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradeshowfeed.com/?p=252#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I thought the web cast on drayage was very informative. One problem that frustrates me is the drayage is based on weight. I may have two boxes the same size. One weighs 100lbs and the other 2500lbs. Both require the forklift to unload and move in place. Same labor same time, however, I have to pay 24 times more drayage on the heavier crate. This is typical with my products and most of them are very heavy, but are a lift and set in place, just as a lighter item would be. Doesn&#039;t seem fair that my heavier products always bear the bulk of the drayage charge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought the web cast on drayage was very informative. One problem that frustrates me is the drayage is based on weight. I may have two boxes the same size. One weighs 100lbs and the other 2500lbs. Both require the forklift to unload and move in place. Same labor same time, however, I have to pay 24 times more drayage on the heavier crate. This is typical with my products and most of them are very heavy, but are a lift and set in place, just as a lighter item would be. Doesn&#8217;t seem fair that my heavier products always bear the bulk of the drayage charge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

